Site Menu


Click here to go to anywhere on this site.
Santa Clara County logo
County of Santa Clara: Airports DepartmentPalo Alto AirportSouth County AirportNewsDocuments & Forms

 

 

Table of Contents

Introduction

Section 1

Section 2

Section 3

Section 4

Section 5

Section 6

Section 7

Section 7c

Section 8

Appendix

Letter

Management Audit of the Airports Division

Airport Division Audit
12/11/99


October 29, 1999

Honorable Pete McHugh, Finance and Government Operations Committee Chairman

Honorable James Beall, Jr., Committee Member

Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara

70 W. Hedding Street, Tenth Floor, East Wing

San Jose, CA 95110

Dear Supervisors McHugh and Beall:

The Management Audit Division is pleased to present this management audit of the Airports Division of the Roads & Airports Department of the County of Santa Clara. This audit was conducted pursuant to a directive of the Board of Supervisors under the Board’s power of inquiry as provided in Article III, Paragraph 302 of the County Charter.

The purpose of this audit was to examine the operations, practices, and finances of the Airports Division and determine if opportunities exist for improving the efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of the Division. The scope of the audit included all aspects of the Airports Division: finances; staffing; organization structure; business practices; planning and decision-making; and, use of equipment and resources. At the request of the Board of Supervisors, a financial analysis of the Airport Enterprise Fund was included as part of this audit.

Audit methods included interviews with Roads & Airports Department executive management and financial staff, interviews with Airports Division management staff and supervisors, a detailed review of the financial records of the Airport Enterprise Fund from FY 1995-96 through FY 1998-99, a review of Federal Aviation Administration and County airport regulations, interviews with selected members of the Airports Commission (all commissioners were offered the opportunity to be interviewed but only those who responded to the offer were interviewed), a review of all leases between the County and fixed base operator tenants (FBOs), an analysis of aircraft storage rental rates and all other airport charges and revenues, a review of the capital improvement plan and Master Plan for the airports, a review of the agreement between the County and City of Palo Alto regarding operation of the Palo Alto Airport, an analysis of staff utilization and workload, interviews with selected FBOs, and administration of a survey of 26 other airports in California and follow up interviews with selected airports. Field work was conducted between April and September, 1999.

A total of eight finding areas were identified and 31 recommendations developed through this audit. Recommendations were made in the area of financial management, hangar lease rates, new hangar construction, fuel flowage fee revenue collection, commercial development and property management at the airports, staffing, the County’s agreement with the City of Palo Alto pertaining to the Palo Alto Airport, and management and policy direction of the County airports. When fully implemented, these audit recommendations will improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of airport operations.

Due to the Airport Enterprise Fund’s current cash position, we are recommending that it make an accelerated General Fund loan pay-off this fiscal year of $400,000 and continue to make payments to the General Fund in subsequent years of at least $75,000 per year to pay off General Fund loans and repay approximately $3.6 million in General Fund contributed capital.

We are recommending a number of actions to increase the operating profits at the County airports so that all airports operate profitably, the Airport Enterprise Fund is able to pay off its General Fund obligations, and needed improvements can be made at all facilities. These recommendations include: standardizing existing hangar rental rates so that all tenants pay the same rental rates for comparable hangar facilities; replacing less profitable tie-down spaces with more profitable hangars to be operated by the County; continuing to enhance fuel flowage fee collection procedures to ensure that this revenue source is maximized, preparing and implementing a commercial development plan for unused airport property, reducing budgeted staff positions at the airports and reducing overtime expenses through a more efficient use of airport staff; renegotiating the Palo Alto Airport agreement with the City of Palo Alto to enable improved financial performance at that facility; and, clarifying the management structure and policy direction of the airports through a strategic planning process linked to the new master planning process recently authorized by the Board of Supervisors.

If all recommendations are implemented, the County General Fund would receive an unanticipated $400,000 this fiscal year and at least $75,000 per year in subsequent years for a combination of early loan pay-off and repayment of contributed capital. Airport revenues would increase in the short term by between approximately $87,760 to $108,700 through hangar lease rate standardization. Budgeted costs would decrease by approximately $53,860 through a reduction in budgeted staff and overtime costs. Longer term revenue enhancements resulting from new hangar construction could be as high as $771,000 per year after construction costs are paid off. Though commercial development revenues will depend on the exact type of development planned at the County airports, a survey of 10 other California airports that have actively developed non-aviation commercial activity report annual median revenues of $733,386.

We would like to thank the staff of the Roads & Airports Department and particularly its Airports Division for their full cooperation and assistance in the performance of this management audit.

Respectfully submitted,

Roger Mialocq

Management Audit Division Manager

Project Staff

Fred Brousseau
Joe Rose
James Edison

Supervisor Alvarado

Supervisor Gage

Supervisor Simitian


Go to top of page. Go to top of page

Last updated on 3/26/02