Management Audit of the Airports
Division
Airport Division
Audit
12/11/99
3. New Hangar Construction
- There is currently a waiting list for hangars
at Reid-Hillview Airport, and a survey of other airports indicates
that there are waiting lists at other San Francisco Bay Area airports,
as well. This would seem to indicate that the Department is not
meeting existing demand for hangars.
-
Additional occupied hangars would
provide more revenue for the Airport Enterprise Fund.
-
Once the hangars are paid off,
they could provide as much as $771,000 in additional annual revenue
to the Airport Enterprise Fund.
Survey Results
According to a survey of general aviation
airports in California conducted by the Management Auditor, 58.8% of
the airports surveyed reported that they planned to construct hangars
in the near future, including almost all of the San Francisco Bay Area
airports that responded. Furthermore, all of the San Francisco Bay Area
airports that responded to the survey reported a waiting list for hangars.
This, combined with the fact that there is currently a waiting list
of 114 individuals for hangars at Reid-Hillview suggests that considerable
demand exists in the San Francisco Bay Area in general, and in Santa
Clara County in particular, for additional hangars.
As discussed in Section 1 of this report,
it appears that leasing hangars directly is much more profitable for
airports than simply collecting lease payments from FBOs who themselves
lease hangars. The hangars at Palo Alto Airport, for example, provide
only a fraction of the income obtained from the hangars leased directly
by the Department at Reid-Hillview Airport. The survey results reflect
the same pattern.
Reid-Hillview Airport
Department staff have completed an analysis
of the costs of constructing 76 new hangars at Reid-Hillview Airport,
each with a concrete foundation and electrical service, approximately
1,298 square feet in size. Department staff report that 76 is the number
of hangars of that size able to fit on the available land at the airport.
The analysis concluded that the cost of constructing the hangars would
be approximately $4,243,000, or $43 per square foot. The proposed hangars
would be constructed on existing tie-down spaces, with no increase in
the overall based aircraft capacity of Reid-Hillview Airport.
Based on discussions with staff at other
airports who are constructing or have recently constructed hangars,
with a hangar manufacturer and with staff of the CalTrans Airport Loan
Program, it appears that the costs of constructing the proposed hangars
at Reid-Hillview Airport estimated by Department staff are quite high.
Airport staff at Watsonville, for example, have reported that the Tee
hangars recently constructed there cost in the neighborhood of $22 per
square foot. Staff at the CalTrans Airport Loan Program have indicated
that the hangar construction projects they finance cost in the neighborhood
of $20 per square foot. Staff at Nunno Corporation, a hangar construction
company, have indicated that a cost of $43 per square foot is extremely
expensive, and related that a bid was recently completed for hangar
construction at Sonoma County Airport with a cost of approximately $28
per square foot, including extensive utility work. Accordingly, a cost
of $30 per square foot appears to be a more reasonable, but still conservative,
estimate for the costs of constructing hangars of the type proposed
at Reid-Hillview and South County. Based on $30 per square foot, the
total cost of hangar construction would be $2,959,500, $1,283,500 less
than the estimate prepared by Department Staff. The tables below include
financing details for this lower construction cost.
The following table details the financing
of the proposed new hangars if they were to be rented at the same rate
as the current rate for the Old County Hangars, $298 per month. There
are two financing scenarios. The Department could obtain a loan and
pay a fixed amount each month (Fixed Payment) as with a standard residential
mortgage, diverting any subsequent additional proceeds from cost of
living adjustments or other lease increases to the Airport Enterprise
Fund.* Alternatively, the Department could utilize the full
lease proceeds in future years to pay down the balance of the loan (Accelerated
Payoff). Both scenarios assume an annual lease adjustment of 3% and
an interest rate of 4.8%, the rate currently available from the CalTrans
Airport Loan Program. In light of the current waiting list, 76 hangars
appears to be a reasonable number to construct with the expectation
that they will be occupied immediately.
Table 3.1
Reid-Hillview Airport
New Hangar Financing at Current
Old County Hangar Rates
| |
Department Estimate
|
Auditor Estimate
|
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated
|
| Interest Rate |
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
| Amount Financed |
$4,243,000
|
$4,243,000
|
$2,959,500
|
$2,959,500
|
| Initial Monthly
Payment |
$22,648
|
$22,648
|
$22,648
|
$22,648
|
| Last Monthly Payment |
$22,648
|
$38,557
|
$22,648
|
$32,291
|
|
Additional Revenue Resulting from Difference Between Debt Service
Payments and Inflation-Adjusted Lease Amounts1
|
$4,407,894
|
$0
|
$978,098
|
$0
|
| Years to Payoff |
29
|
20
|
15
|
13
|
1For accelerated financing, all additional
revenues from cost of living adjustments would be used to make early
debt service payments. |
As illustrated in the above table, using
all of the lease proceeds in future years to make debt service payments
can make a considerable difference in the duration of the debt service.
In the case of the Department’s cost estimate, the term of the loan
drops from 29 to 20 years. However, as will be explained in more detail
later, such a payment strategy deprives the Airport Enterprise Fund
of revenues that could be obtained from the proposed hangars before
their debt is retired.
As detailed in Section 2 above, it appears
that the County can charge more for the Old County Hangars than the
current rate as specified in Table 3.1. The following table details
the financing of the proposed hangars at the proposed new rates equivalent
to similar transportable hangars, as explained in greater detail in
Section 2.
Table 3.2
Reid-Hillview Airport
New Hangar Financing at Proposed Old
County Hangar Rates
| |
Department Estimate
|
Auditor Estimate
|
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated
|
| Interest Rate |
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
| Amount Financed |
$4,243,000
|
$4,243,000
|
$2,959,500
|
$2,959,500
|
| Initial Monthly Payment |
$27,740
|
$27,740
|
$27,740
|
$27,740
|
| Last Monthly Payment |
$27,740
|
$43,218
|
$27,740
|
$37,280
|
|
Additional Revenue Resulting from Difference Between Debt Service
Payments and Inflation-Adjusted Lease Amounts*
|
$2,287,010
|
$0
|
$729,683
|
$0
|
| Years to Payoff |
20
|
16
|
12
|
11
|
*For accelerated financing, all additional revenues from cost of
living adjustments would be used to make early debt service payments. |
As can be seen in the table above, charging
a higher rate for the Old County Hangars, and therefore making larger
payments on the construction loan, results in considerably fewer years
of debt service. Fixed Payment financing of the construction costs estimated
by the Department would require 20 years, instead of 29 as detailed
in Table 3.1, and Fixed Payment financing of the construction costs
estimated by the management auditor (at $30 per square foot) would require
12 years, instead of 15 as detailed in Table 3.1.
Given that the proposed hangars are considerably
larger than the Old County Hangars, 1,298 square feet versus 934 square
feet, it appears that the County could charge more per month for the
proposed new hangars than the rate proposed to be charged for Old County
Hangars, as detailed in Section 2. However, larger hangars generally
are less expensive per square foot. As a result, the proposed rental
rate for the new Reid-Hillview Airport hangars reflects a lower cost
per square foot ($0.32 versus $0.35) but a higher total cost per month
($428.35 versus $365). The financing terms under such a higher lease
rate are detailed below.
Table 3.3
Reid-Hillview Airport
New Hangar Financing at Proposed
Higher Rates
| |
Department Estimate
|
Auditor Estimate
|
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated
|
| Interest Rate |
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
| Amount Financed |
$4,243,000
|
$4,243,000
|
$2,959,500
|
$2,959,500
|
| Initial Monthly Payment |
$32,555
|
$32,555
|
$32,555
|
$32,555
|
| Last Monthly Payment |
$32,555
|
$46,415
|
$32,555
|
$41,239
|
|
Additional Revenue Resulting from Difference Between Debt Service
Payments and Inflation-Adjusted Lease Amounts*
|
$1,405,930
|
$0
|
$452,809
|
$0
|
| Years to Payoff |
15
|
13
|
9
|
9
|
*For accelerated financing, all additional revenues from cost of
living adjustments would be used to make early debt service payments. |
Under the financing scenarios detailed
above, the term of payment drops further than in Table 3.2, from 20
years to 15 years for the Fixed Payment financing of the construction
costs as estimated by the Department and from 12 years to 9 years for
the Fixed Payment financing of the construction costs as estimated by
the Management Auditor ($30 per square foot).
As can be seen in the tables above, the
advantage of the Accelerated Payoff structure is that it results in
a considerably earlier retirement of the debt owed for hangar construction.
The advantage of the Fixed Payment financing structure, on the other
hand, is that it would provide additional revenue, beginning in the
second year, as the yearly inflation adjustment is applied to the lease
rates. Given the financial condition of the Airport Enterprise Fund,
the Management Auditors believe that the Fixed Payment Structure would
be the preferable option, since it provides additional revenue before
the debt is retired. As noted above, the additional revenue can be used
only for debt repayment and project maintenance. Any additional revenue
generated by the project must be kept in a trust account until the loan
is paid off. Since the loans are made at below market interest rates,
it appears that the County would benefit from keeping any excess revenues
from the new hangars in the trust account, where it would earn more
interest than the interest charged on the loan.
It appears that at either increased lease
rate the construction of hangars at Reid-Hillview Airport would be feasible,
however, given the availability of suitable financing and continued
demand for hangar spaces.
South County Airport
Roads and Airports Department staff have
reported that the area around South County Airport is expected to develop
significantly in the future as the business and residential areas of
San Jose spread south. Most notably, Cisco Systems has reportedly bought
property in the area to construct a new corporate headquarters. Staff
expects that the demand for aircraft storage and operations in the vicinity
of South County will increase, and allow for development and other revenue
enhancing opportunities at the airport, such as an additional FBO and
new hangars.
The Department conducted an analysis
of construction of hangars at South County Airport, as at Reid-Hillview
Airport. The Department examined the cost of constructing a mix of 77
hangars of various sizes, with a total area of approximately 107,900
feet, and estimated the cost of construction to be $4,231,000, or $39
per square foot. The Department selected 77 hangars because that is
how many can fit on the airport property without increasing aircraft
storage capacity through conversion of existing tie-downs to hangars.
As in the case of the Reid-Hillview construction estimate, this cost
seems excessive compared to hangar construction at other locations.
The financial analysis below therefore also includes an estimate of
the Management Auditor for construction costs at South County Airport,
equal to $3,237,000, or $30 per square foot.
Additionally, it is not clear that there
is sufficient demand to fill 77 hangars at South County with tenants.
There appears to be excess demand for hangars at nearby airports, including
Hollister, Watsonville and Reid-Hillview, but there is no guarantee
of occupancy at South County. The Department should conduct a survey
to determine whether sufficient demand exists before commencing construction
of the new hangars.
To estimate revenue from the proposed
hangars, the Management Auditor examined the proposed rate structure
at Reid-Hillview Airport as detailed in Section 2, and applied a similar
rate at South County Airport for similar hangars, less a discount to
reflect that fact that there is less demand for aircraft storage at
South County Airport, because it is a greater distance away from the
center of San Jose.
Table 3.4
South County Airport
New Hangar Financing
| |
Department Estimate
|
Auditor Estimate
|
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated
|
Fixed
|
Accelerated |
| Interest Rate |
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
4.8%
|
| Amount Financed |
$4,231,000
|
$4,231,000
|
$3,237,000
|
$3,237,000
|
| Initial Monthly Payment |
$31,709
|
$31,709
|
$31,709
|
$31,709
|
| Last Monthly Payment |
$31,709
|
$45,209
|
$31,709
|
$41,372
|
|
Additional Revenue Resulting from Difference Between Debt Service
Payments and Annually Adjusted Lease Amounts*
|
$1,581,705
|
$0
|
$687,871
|
$0
|
| Years to Payoff |
16
|
13
|
11
|
10
|
*For accelerated financing, all additional revenues from cost of
living adjustments would be used to make early debt service payments. |
As can be seen in the above table, Fixed
Payment financing of the proposed South County hangars could be completed
in 16 years, based on the Department’s construction cost estimate or,
in 11 years based on the Management Auditor’s cost estimate. As is the
case with the Reid Hillview Airport Fixed Payment financing, the Fixed
Payment financing of the 16-year loan based on the Department’s cost
estimate would yield additional revenue, approximately $1,581,705 during
the term of the loan and the Fixed Payment financing of the 11-year
loan based on the Management Auditor’s cost estimate would yield approximately
$687,871 during the term of the loan.
Currently, there is no waiting list for
hangars at South County Airport, but it is expected that some of those
currently on the waiting list at Reid-Hillview Airport would be willing
to locate their aircraft at South County, and that, based on experience
at Watsonville Airport, additional individuals would come forward to
occupy hangars, once the plan for their construction is made public.
Several years ago the Department conducted an informal survey of local
pilots to determine demand for hangars at South County Airport, and
found strong interest. The Department should conduct a new survey to
confirm sufficient interest for the 77 proposed hangars before commencing
construction of that number of hangars.
One possibility would be to construct
the hangars in two or more phases, proceeding with a subsequent phase
only once the previous phase has been leased. This plan would also help
to solve a potential financing constraint, in that CalTrans Airport
Loan Program staff have indicated that they do not generally finance
projects as large as the ones proposed at South County and Reid-Hilllview.
If the CalTrans funds were not available, the Department would probably
have to pay higher rates on financing the proposed hangars, reducing
the economic viability of the projects.
Conclusions
There is currently a waiting list for
hangars at Reid-Hillview Airport, and a survey of other airports indicates
that there are waiting lists at other San Francisco Bay Area airports,
as well. This would seem to indicate that the Department is not meeting
existing demand for hangars. Additional occupied hangars would provide
more revenue for the Airport Enterprise Fund.
Recommendations
It is recommended that the Roads and
Airports Department:
- Conduct a survey to gauge demand for new hangars
at South County Airport;
- Review estimated hangar construction costs
using input from vendors and other airports to develop more realistic
cost estimates;
- Obtain conceptual approval from the Board of
Supervisors for construction and rental of new hangars at Reid-Hillview
and South County Airports;
- Proceed with obtaining financing for the appropriate
number of new hangars at Reid-Hillview and South County based
on the results of the hangar demand study.
Costs and Benefits
Once the hangars are paid off, they could
provide as much as $771,000 in additional annual revenue to the Airport
Enterprise Fund.